Invented in 1901, SF6's first commercial use in the utility industry came decades later, in 1956. Before SF6 became widely available, utilities break switches had atmospheric air or oil as insulation.
The SF6 technology reduced the risk of fire and explosion and reduced the size of the equipment. The high global warming potential was handled by closed material loops with low emissions.
With the increasing installation volume of SF6, its long life time and the demand to eliminate greenhouse gases to fight climate change, a new switching and insulation technology without any greenhouse gases has been developed. Vacuum and atmospheric air breakers compete in the breaker marketplace, but SF6 remains the most popular choice for most utilities despite the serious drawbacks. For example, PG&E's research found SF6 breakers are expensive to maintain because employees and contractors must wear complete scuba equipment to fix that equipment.
An SF6 leak costs PG&E an average of $25,000. California's regulations call for the utility to maintain a leak rate of less than 1%, leading to a situation that requires considerable and expensive leak testing. After buying equipment from one vendor, PG&E found it had to spend an additional $1 million to rework equipment to meet the 1% leakage threshold, according to an article in a 2020 T&D World article penned by Rak.
Rak’s article describes how and why the utility invested in dry-air/vacuum technology that underpinned the Siemens Energy contract for circuit breakers that use treated air, or "Clean Air," as the insulating medium along with vacuum interrupters for switching functions. While the utility chose siemens Energy technology, he noted that other companies also have similar dry/vacuum product offerings.