This issue of energy security, which goes hand-in-hand with energy affordability and sustainability, is core to the energy transition. It starts with investments. Energy projects are incredibly capital-intensive and made with timescales of multiple decades.
Something simple like a transformer, for example, will stand for 30 or 40 years before being replaced. Companies will only make these long-term decisions if they are sure governments will support them for that long. That is why governments must provide direct investments or loans and remove regulations that disincentivize energy investments.
Affordability is the next big issue. One of the biggest obstacles in the energy transition is price. Green alternatives for making steel can double the cost of the material. For cement, greener options to clinker can increase the price threefold. Only by making these options economically viable will they be used at scale. By encouraging investment, governments can help industries bring these costs down.
Pricing also affected the electricity market this year more than in the past. The war in Ukraine caused electricity prices to spike, but it’s not the only cause: high material costs and carbon prices have pushed prices up for years. While this is causing problems in the market, it comes with a silver lining: cleaner, more efficient technologies, like green hydrogen, may become more competitive, giving industries an incentive to switch. So each project brings us a step closer.
Our 2030 targets are less than a decade away, so we need to achieve them using much of the same infrastructure we have now. The only way to meet our emission targets is by decarbonizing hard-to-abate industries. That means quick thinking and quicker action. If we manage that, one of the biggest challenges in our quest for a greener future can be solved.